Public ownership includes the BBC, and is what we pay our TV licence for. It is paid for, and therefore owned, by the public, and everything it does must be in the public's best interest. Advantages of this type of ownership include the ability for people to complain via e-mail, text, letter, etc., and then the BBC will look into your issue and do its best to improve the service. Also, as the BBC works to serve the public, it has to be unbiased and not give personal opinions and it cannot attempt to influence the audience's views. Disadvantages of this type of ownership is that there is not always a variety of programmes, or the programmes they show may not always appeal to everyone. The BBC only produces its own shows and does not show, for example, shows from America. Other TV channels will bring those shows to this country making them more popular among many people. Another disadvantage of publicly owned television is that you have to pay a licence fee for it, which some people do not agree with.
Private ownership is funded by adverts and has an agenda, which are major disadvantages. It will put popular shows on in order to gain more viewers, and does not often do things in the public's best interest. Privately owned television does not have the same standards as privately owned TV, and can be biased. Often, privately owned TV channels, such as Dave, will re-run popular shows almost constantly to attract viewers. An advantage of privately owned television is that you do not have to pay a licence fee for it, however unless you have a TV with built in Freeview, you will still have to pay for services such as Virgin or Sky. Another advantage of privately owned television is that there is often a wider variety of shows of different genres and from different countries, which is seen as more interesting to a lot of people.